netdev - [PATCH v2 1/1] [net-next] igb: Fix spelling in igb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxhruNNXvQI-xUwE@Fantasy-Ubuntu>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:21:28 -0600
From: Johnny Park <pjohnny0508@...il.com>
To: horms@...nel.org
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, andrew@...n.ch, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] [net-next] igb: Fix spelling in igb_main.c

Simple patch that fix spelling mistakes in igb_main.c

Signed-off-by: Johnny Park <pjohnny0508@...il.com>
---
Changes in v2:
  - Fix spelling mor -> more
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index 1ef4cb871452..fc587304b3c0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static int igb_alloc_q_vector(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
 	/* initialize pointer to rings */
 	ring = q_vector->ring;
 
-	/* intialize ITR */
+	/* initialize ITR */
 	if (rxr_count) {
 		/* rx or rx/tx vector */
 		if (!adapter->rx_itr_setting || adapter->rx_itr_setting > 3)
@@ -3906,7 +3906,7 @@ static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
  *
  *  This function initializes the vf specific data storage and then attempts to
  *  allocate the VFs.  The reason for ordering it this way is because it is much
- *  mor expensive time wise to disable SR-IOV than it is to allocate and free
+ *  more expensive time wise to disable SR-IOV than it is to allocate and free
  *  the memory for the VFs.
  **/
 static void igb_probe_vfs(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
-- 
2.43.0