lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42f19231-dbe3-4fce-8836-75089f280296@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 02:22:08 +0200
From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
 Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling
 <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wwan: core: Pass string literal as format
 argument of dev_set_name()

Hello Simon,

On 23.10.2024 15:15, Simon Horman wrote:
> Both gcc-14 and clang-18 report that passing a non-string literal as the
> format argument of dev_set_name() is potentially insecure.
> 
> E.g. clang-18 says:
> 
> drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c:442:34: warning: format string is not a string literal (potentially insecure) [-Wformat-security]
>    442 |         return dev_set_name(&port->dev, buf);
>        |                                         ^~~
> drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c:442:34: note: treat the string as an argument to avoid this
>    442 |         return dev_set_name(&port->dev, buf);
>        |                                         ^
>        |                                         "%s",
> 
> It is always the case where the contents of mod is safe to pass as the
> format argument. That is, in my understanding, it never contains any
> format escape sequences.
> 
> But, it seems better to be safe than sorry. And, as a bonus, compiler
> output becomes less verbose by addressing this issue as suggested by
> clang-18.
> 
> Compile tested only.
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

Theoretically, we can pass a string literal there and all the arguments 
required to build a proper device name of multiple elements to save some 
ticks on the format string processing.

But this will require a deep rework still with intermediate string 
formatting. And since the performance of the name allocation is not the 
case here, lets go with your solution as way more simple and clear.

Acked-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>

> ---
>   drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c
> index 17431f1b1a0c..465e2a0d57a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int __wwan_port_dev_assign_name(struct wwan_port *port, const char *fmt)
>   		return -ENFILE;
>   	}
>   
> -	return dev_set_name(&port->dev, buf);
> +	return dev_set_name(&port->dev, "%s", buf);
>   }
>   
>   struct wwan_port *wwan_create_port(struct device *parent,
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ