lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33862f10-726d-49d3-8f86-ccef1f6792e7@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:40:19 +0800
From: Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
 horms@...nel.org, antony.antony@...unet.com, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com,
 jakub@...udflare.com, fred.cc@...baba-inc.com,
 yubing.qiuyubing@...baba-inc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 4/4] ipv6/udp: Add 4-tuple hash for connected
 socket



On 2024/10/31 20:45, Philo Lu wrote:
> Implement ipv6 udp hash4 like that in ipv4. The major difference is that
> the hash value should be calculated with udp6_ehashfn(). Besides,
> ipv4-mapped ipv6 address is handled before hash() and rehash().
> 
> Core procedures of hash/unhash/rehash are same as ipv4, and udpv4 and
> udpv6 share the same udptable, so some functions in ipv4 hash4 can also
> be shared.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cambda Zhu <cambda@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fred Chen <fred.cc@...baba-inc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yubing Qiu <yubing.qiuyubing@...baba-inc.com>
> ---
>   net/ipv6/udp.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> index 1ea99d704e31..64f13f258fca 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> @@ -110,8 +110,17 @@ void udp_v6_rehash(struct sock *sk)
>   	u16 new_hash = ipv6_portaddr_hash(sock_net(sk),
>   					  &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
>   					  inet_sk(sk)->inet_num);
> +	u16 new_hash4;
>   
> -	udp_lib_rehash(sk, new_hash, 0); /* 4-tuple hash not implemented */
> +	if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr)) {
> +		new_hash4 = udp_ehashfn(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num,
> +					sk->sk_daddr, sk->sk_dport);

Just found udp_ehashfn() used here results in an build error of 
undefined function.

I think the `ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr)` branch can be 
moved into udp_lib_rehash() to fix the issue. So in the worst case, we 
need to calculate the newhash4 twice in ipv6 hash4 rehash, one in 
udp_v6_rehash() and the other in udp_lib_rehash().

> +	} else {
> +		new_hash4 = udp6_ehashfn(sock_net(sk), &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num,
> +					 &sk->sk_v6_daddr, sk->sk_dport);
> +	}
> +
> +	udp_lib_rehash(sk, new_hash, new_hash4);
>   }
>   

-- 
Philo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ