[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45cab833-4bf8-404b-8ffb-252671f1d65c@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 10:03:50 +0800
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "Jay
Vosburgh" <jv@...sburgh.net>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman
<gal@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, Boris Pismenny
<borisp@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: add ESP offload features when slaves
support
On 11/1/2024 8:48 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:31:12 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
>> + if (gso_partial_features & NETIF_F_GSO_ESP)
>> + bond_dev->gso_partial_features |= NETIF_F_GSO_ESP;
>> + else
>> + bond_dev->gso_partial_features &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_ESP;
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
>
> Hiding the block under ifdef is unnecessary.
OK.
> If you worry about the no-lower devs case - add IS_ENABLED()
It will jump to done and bond_dev->gso_partial_features is not changed.
Seems no need to take care of such case, right?
> to the if condition. The local variable doesn't have to be under
> ifdef either (making it more rev xmas tree compatible)
Sure, I will change in V2.
Thanks!
Jianbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists