lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <141acc87-19a4-44b5-a222-3f159835c711@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:49:23 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@...dict.gg>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 idosch@...sch.org, edumazet@...gle.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 shuah@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] net: ipv4: Cache pmtu for all packet paths if
 multipath enabled

Hi,

On 11/1/24 18:34, Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
> On Fri Nov 1, 2024 at 4:45 PM MSK, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri,  1 Nov 2024 10:48:57 +0000 Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
>>> +	pmtu_ipv4_mp_exceptions		ipv4: PMTU multipath nh exceptions		0"
>>
>> This new test seems to fail in our CI:
>>
>> # TEST: ipv4: PMTU multipath nh exceptions                            [FAIL]
>> #   there are not enough cached exceptions
>>
>> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/840861/3-pmtu-sh/stdout
> 
> Yes it failed in V4 patch, in this V5 its already ok:
> 
> # TEST: ipv4: PMTU multipath nh exceptions                            [ OK ]
> ok 1 selftests: net: pmtu.sh
> 
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-dbg/results/841042/2-pmtu-sh/stdout
> 
> But in V5, there is failed test, not sure that this patch causes fail:
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-dbg/results/841042/31-busy-poll-test-sh/stdout
> 
>>
>> Also some process notes:
>>  - please don't post multiple versions of the patch a day:
>>    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#tl-dr
>>  - please avoid posting new versions in-reply-to the old one
> Thanks, will keep it in mind next time, sorry for my ignorance

Some additional notes:

- please do answer to Ido's question: what about ipv6?
- move the changelog after the SoB tag and a '---' separator, so that it
will not be included into the git commit message
- post new revisions of the patch in a different thread

Thanks,

Paolo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ