[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241103075409.0d31e277@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 07:54:09 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, michael.chan@...adcom.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, vikas.gupta@...adcom.com,
andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: ethtool: Fix ip[6] ntuple rule
verification
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 22:58:30 -0600 Daniel Xu wrote:
> The reason was that all the l4proto validation was being run despite the
> l4proto mask being set to 0x0. Fix by only running l4proto validation
> when mask is set.
Limitation is odd, but it's not a regression nor does it violate
the uAPI so I think net-next would be appropriate, no Fixes tag
(you can say "commit xyz ("..") added.." as the reference).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists