[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iK8Owkcc=sTWx6pg99MT0UxMAPkH0+JNqkDc52=x+qPMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:25:05 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 7/7] rtnetlink: Register rtnl_dellink() and
rtnl_setlink() with RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_PERNET_WIP.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:41 AM Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:24:32PM -0800, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > Currently, rtnl_setlink() and rtnl_dellink() cannot be fully converted
> > to per-netns RTNL due to a lack of handling peer/lower/upper devices in
> > different netns.
> >
> > For example, when we change a device in rtnl_setlink() and need to
> > propagate that to its upper devices, we want to avoid acquiring all netns
> > locks, for which we do not know the upper limit.
> >
> > The same situation happens when we remove a device.
> >
> > rtnl_dellink() could be transformed to remove a single device in the
> > requested netns and delegate other devices to per-netns work, and
> > rtnl_setlink() might be ?
> >
> > Until we come up with a better idea, let's use a new flag
> > RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_PERNET_WIP for rtnl_dellink() and rtnl_setlink().
> >
> > This will unblock converting RTNL users where such devices are not related.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/rtnetlink.h | 1 +
> > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists