netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: can: convert tcan4x5x.txt to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4715808e-4066-4e64-979d-2ec75cd0d210@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:27:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
 Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: can: convert tcan4x5x.txt to DT schema

On 06/11/2024 15:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:24:34PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
>> +  device-wake-gpios:
>> +    description:
>> +      Wake up GPIO to wake up the TCAN device.
>> +      Not available with tcan4552/4553.
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  bosch,mram-cfg:
> 
> Last time I wrote:
> "You need to mention all changes done to the binding in the commit msg."
> 
> Then I wrote again:
> "Yeah, CAREFULLY [read][//this was missing, added now] previous review
> and respond to all comments or implement all of them (or any
> combination). If you leave one comment ignored, it will mean reviewer
> has to do same work twice. That's very discouraging and wasteful of my
> time."
> 
> Then I wrote:
> "Where? I pointed out that this is a change. I cannot find it...."
> 
> So we are back at the same spot but I waste much more time to respond
> and repeat the same.
> 
> You must address all comments: either respond, fix or ask for
> clarifications. You cannot leave anything ignored.
> 
> I am not going to review the rest.

Uh, I am wrong. You did remove the supplies, but I just looked at wrong
version. Apologies, everything is fine and you did implement my
feedback. Thank you.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof