netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: freescale: ucc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <83151aa4-62e9-4be9-ae64-a728be004dae@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 18:49:00 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: freescale: ucc_geth: Fix WOL
 configuration

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:02:51PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> The get/set_wol ethtool ops rely on querying the PHY for its WoL
> capabilities, checking for the presence of a PHY and a PHY interrupts
> isn't enough. Address that by cleaning up the WoL configuration
> sequence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth_ethtool.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth_ethtool.c
> index fb5254d7d1ba..2a085f8f34b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth_ethtool.c
> @@ -346,26 +346,37 @@ static void uec_get_wol(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
>  	struct ucc_geth_private *ugeth = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  	struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev;
>  
> -	if (phydev && phydev->irq)
> -		wol->supported |= WAKE_PHY;
> +	wol->supported = 0;
> +	wol->wolopts = 0;
> +
> +	if (phydev)
> +		phy_ethtool_get_wol(phydev, wol);
> +
>  	if (qe_alive_during_sleep())
>  		wol->supported |= WAKE_MAGIC;

So get WoL will return whatever methods the PHY supports, plus
WAKE_MAGIC is added because i assume the MAC can do that. So depending
on the PHY, it could be the full list:

#define WAKE_PHY		(1 << 0)
#define WAKE_UCAST		(1 << 1)
#define WAKE_MCAST		(1 << 2)
#define WAKE_BCAST		(1 << 3)
#define WAKE_ARP		(1 << 4)
#define WAKE_MAGIC		(1 << 5)
#define WAKE_MAGICSECURE	(1 << 6) /* only meaningful if WAKE_MAGIC */
#define WAKE_FILTER		(1 << 7)

>  
> -	wol->wolopts = ugeth->wol_en;
> +	wol->wolopts |= ugeth->wol_en;
>  }
>  
>  static int uec_set_wol(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
>  {
>  	struct ucc_geth_private *ugeth = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  	struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (wol->wolopts & ~(WAKE_PHY | WAKE_MAGIC))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	else if (wol->wolopts & WAKE_PHY && (!phydev || !phydev->irq))
> +	else if ((wol->wolopts & WAKE_PHY) && !phydev)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	else if (wol->wolopts & WAKE_MAGIC && !qe_alive_during_sleep())
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (wol->wolopts & WAKE_PHY)
> +		ret = phy_ethtool_set_wol(phydev, wol);

Here, the code only calls into the PHY for WAKE_PHY, when in fact the
PHY could be handling WAKE_UCAST, WAKE_MCAST, WAKE_ARP etc.

So these conditions are wrong. It could we be that X years ago when
this code was added only WAKE_PHY and WAKE_MAGIC existed?

	Andrew