[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cf08624-cd84-41bf-beef-ca3b3573303e@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 22:43:04 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marion & Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: dsa: add devm_dsa_register_switch()
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 09:53:48PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 09:35:32PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > +int devm_dsa_register_switch(struct device *dev, struct dsa_switch *ds)
> > > +{
> > > + int err;
> > > +
> > > + err = dsa_register_switch(ds);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > +
> > > + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_dsa_unregister_switch, ds);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_register_switch);
> >
> > This looks to be the wrong function name.
> >
>
> Ah... Anyway aside from this, is the feature OK? Questioning why it
> wasn't proposed early...
Some people blindly make use of devm_ without thinking about
ordering. These helpers can introduce bugs. So they are not always
liked.
It would be best if you added the helper at the same time as its user.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists