[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241113164635.3b02c8b3@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:46:35 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>,
davem@...emloft.net, mkubecek@...e.cz, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool-next] rxclass: Make output for RSS context
action explicit
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 03:30:05 +0000 Edward Cree wrote:
> On 12/11/2024 15:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Hm, interesting idea...
> > Practically speaking I think it introduces complexity and I'm not sure
> > anyone will actually benefit (IOW why would anyone want to keep /
> > create context for inactive queues?).
>
> Conceivably to save re-configuring them next time they increase the
> queues again? But I suppose anyone doing that kind of complicated
> demand-flexible tuning will be using some kind of userland software
> that can automate that.
> Anyway I don't have a dog in this fight as sfc doesn't support ethtool
> set-channels. (Which will make it difficult for me to test this; had
> I better extend netdevsim to support RSS & rxnfc?)
Good question on the netdevsim. Adding the callbacks seems fine.
But making it actually do RSS and nfc on packets to make the HW tests
pass would be more of a lift. So I think you'd have to add a separate
test under drivers/net/netdevsim for this. Is that your thinking?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists