[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW4PR11MB588988BB2B4E0D3DBEBAD64B8E242@MW4PR11MB5889.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:07:06 +0000
From: "Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@...el.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
CC: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "Lobakin, Aleksander"
<aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net 01/10] idpf: initial PTP support
On 11/15/2024 2:44 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Milena,
>
>
>Thank you for your patch. It’d be great if you used a statement for the
>summary/title by adding a verb (in imperative mood):
>
>idpf: Add initial PTP support
>
>Am 13.11.24 um 16:46 schrieb Milena Olech:
>> PTP feature is supported if the VIRTCHNL2_CAP_PTP is negotiated during the
>> capabilities recognition. Initial PTP support includes PTP initialization
>> and registration of the clock.
>
>Maybe mention/paste the new debug messages, and document on what device
>you tested it?
>
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Paul
Paul,
Introduced PTP flow should work on all IDPF-compliant adapters.
I've tested on the Intel IPU E2100 adapter.
Regards,
Milena
Powered by blists - more mailing lists