[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kk0gsC8gohDT9aqY6r4E+pxNC6=+v8hZqthbaqzrFhLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:49:20 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: manas18244@...td.ac.in, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: simplify Result<()> uses
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 7:26 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> Please split these patches up per subsystem, and submit them
> individually to the appropriate subsystems.
That is good advice, although if you and block are Ok with an Acked-by
(assuming a good v2), we could do that too.
Manas: I forgot to mention in the issue that this could be a good case
for a `checkpatch.pl` check (I added it now). It would be great if you
could add that in a different (and possibly independent) patch.
Of course, it is not a requirement, but it would be a nice opportunity
to contribute something extra related to this :)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists