[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1651f579-6f9b-4c98-b273-0d7de4e99478@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:15:46 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Nemanov, Michael" <michael.nemanov@...com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sabeeh Khan <sabeeh-khan@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] dt-bindings: net: wireless: cc33xx: Add
ti,cc33xx.yaml
On 12/11/2024 07:45, Nemanov, Michael wrote:
> On 11/8/2024 2:02 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 02:51:53PM +0200, Michael Nemanov wrote:
>>> Add device-tree bindings for the CC33xx family.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Nemanov <michael.nemanov@...com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/net/wireless/ti,cc33xx.yaml | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,cc33xx.yaml
>>>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
>> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
>> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
>> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> </form letter>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Are you referring to
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,cc33xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,cc33xx.yaml
>
> ...
>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + $nodename:
>> + pattern: "^wifi@2"
>
> ?
>
> If so, I replied here
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/8024aa1c-5bd1-40d8-b0c3-14b5fcd992e2@ti.com/#t
> But if you don't think it's worthwhile I'll remove it.
I asked you to remove it. It's not correct, not needed, not beneficial
at all. It is actually harmful because limits re-use. dtc already checks
this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists