netdev - Re: 回覆: [net-next 0/3] Add Aspeed G7 MDIO support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6ae91aae-5939-4ffd-a430-181fb88d259b@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:25:57 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jacky Chou <jacky_chou@...eedtech.com>
Cc: "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
	"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
	"andrew@...econstruct.com.au" <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
	"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 回覆: [net-next 0/3] Add Aspeed
 G7 MDIO support

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 05:35:40AM +0000, Jacky Chou wrote:
> Hi Andrew Lunn
> 
> Thank you for your reply.
> 
> > > The Aspeed 7th generation SoC features three MDIO controllers.
> > > The design of AST2700 MDIO controller is the same as AST2600.
> > 
> > If they are identical, why do you need a new compatible?
> 
> We want consistent naming in the DTS of the new SoC, even if Its 
> design is the same as the older SoC.

You might find the DT Maintainers push back against this. What you
want is effectively a Marketing game, it has little to do with
technology, describing the hardware.

	Andrew