[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241118174456.463c2817@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:44:56 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
Cc: wojackbb@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com, chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com,
haijun.liu@...iatek.com, m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com,
ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
johannes@...solutions.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2] [PATCH net-next v2] net: wwan: t7xx: Change
PM_AUTOSUSPEND_MS to 5000
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:01:47 +0200 Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> > He's decreasing the sleep timer from 20 to 5 sec, both of which
> > are very high for networking, anyway. You appear to be questioning
> > autosuspend itself but it seems to have been added 2 years ago already.
> >
> > What am I missing?
>
> Some possible funny side-effect of sleeping with this chipset. Like
> loosing network connection and dropping TCP sessions. I hope that 20
> seconds was putted on purpose.
>
> Suddenly, I don't have this modem at hand and want to be sure that we
> are not going to receive a stream of bug reports.
Power saving is always tricky, but they say they tested. I think we
should give it a go, worst case - it will be an easy revert.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists