netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs8300-ride: enable ethernet0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cbd696c0-3b25-438b-a279-a4263308323a@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:41:44 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Yijie Yang <quic_yijiyang@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs8300-ride: enable ethernet0

On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 04:51:54PM +0800, Yijie Yang wrote:
> Enable the SerDes PHY on qcs8300-ride. Add the MDC and MDIO pin functions
> for ethernet0 on qcs8300-ride. Enable the ethernet port on qcs8300-ride.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yijie Yang <quic_yijiyang@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300-ride.dts | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300-ride.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300-ride.dts
> index 7eed19a694c39dbe791afb6a991db65acb37e597..af7be26828524cc28299e219c1f0ad459e1c543d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300-ride.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300-ride.dts
> @@ -210,6 +210,95 @@ vreg_l9c: ldo9 {
>  	};
>  };
>  
> +&ethernet0 {
> +	phy-mode = "2500base-x";
> +	phy-handle = <&sgmii_phy0>;

Nit picking, but your PHY clearly is not an SGMII PHY if it is using
2500base-x. I would call it just phy0, so avoiding using SGMII
wrongly, which most vendors do use the name SGMII wrongly.

	Andrew