netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net] ipvs: fix UB due to uninitialized stack access in ip_vs_protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <70cd1035-07d8-4356-a53e-020d93c2515e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:18:07 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
 netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
 Ruowen Qin <ruqin@...hat.com>, Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@...inois.edu>,
 Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Bill Wendling
 <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] ipvs: fix UB due to uninitialized stack access in
 ip_vs_protocol_init()

On 11/23/24 10:42, Jinghao Jia wrote:
> Under certain kernel configurations when building with Clang/LLVM, the
> compiler does not generate a return or jump as the terminator
> instruction for ip_vs_protocol_init(), triggering the following objtool
> warning during build time:
> 
>   vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: ip_vs_protocol_init() falls through to next function __initstub__kmod_ip_vs_rr__935_123_ip_vs_rr_init6()
> 
> At runtime, this either causes an oops when trying to load the ipvs
> module or a boot-time panic if ipvs is built-in. This same issue has
> been reported by the Intel kernel test robot previously.
> 
> Digging deeper into both LLVM and the kernel code reveals this to be a
> undefined behavior problem. ip_vs_protocol_init() uses a on-stack buffer
> of 64 chars to store the registered protocol names and leaves it
> uninitialized after definition. The function calls strnlen() when
> concatenating protocol names into the buffer. With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE
> strnlen() performs an extra step to check whether the last byte of the
> input char buffer is a null character (commit 3009f891bb9f ("fortify:
> Allow strlen() and strnlen() to pass compile-time known lengths")).
> This, together with possibly other configurations, cause the following
> IR to be generated:
> 
>   define hidden i32 @ip_vs_protocol_init() local_unnamed_addr #5 section ".init.text" align 16 !kcfi_type !29 {
>     %1 = alloca [64 x i8], align 16
>     ...
> 
>   14:                                               ; preds = %11
>     %15 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63
>     %16 = load i8, ptr %15, align 1
>     %17 = tail call i1 @llvm.is.constant.i8(i8 %16)
>     %18 = icmp eq i8 %16, 0
>     %19 = select i1 %17, i1 %18, i1 false
>     br i1 %19, label %20, label %23
> 
>   20:                                               ; preds = %14
>     %21 = call i64 @strlen(ptr noundef nonnull dereferenceable(1) %1) #23
>     ...
> 
>   23:                                               ; preds = %14, %11, %20
>     %24 = call i64 @strnlen(ptr noundef nonnull dereferenceable(1) %1, i64 noundef 64) #24
>     ...
>   }
> 
> The above code calculates the address of the last char in the buffer
> (value %15) and then loads from it (value %16). Because the buffer is
> never initialized, the LLVM GVN pass marks value %16 as undefined:
> 
>   %13 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63
>   br i1 undef, label %14, label %17
> 
> This gives later passes (SCCP, in particular) more DCE opportunities by
> propagating the undef value further, and eventually removes everything
> after the load on the uninitialized stack location:
> 
>   define hidden i32 @ip_vs_protocol_init() local_unnamed_addr #0 section ".init.text" align 16 !kcfi_type !11 {
>     %1 = alloca [64 x i8], align 16
>     ...
> 
>   12:                                               ; preds = %11
>     %13 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63
>     unreachable
>   }
> 
> In this way, the generated native code will just fall through to the
> next function, as LLVM does not generate any code for the unreachable IR
> instruction and leaves the function without a terminator.
> 
> Zero the on-stack buffer to avoid this possible UB.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402100205.PWXIz1ZK-lkp@intel.com/
> Co-developed-by: Ruowen Qin <ruqin@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruowen Qin <ruqin@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@...inois.edu>

@Pablo, @Simon, @Julian: recent ipvs patches landed either on the
net(-next) trees or the netfiler trees according to a random (?) pattern.

What is your preference here? Should such patches go via netfilter or
net? Or something else. FTR, I *think* netfilter should be the
preferable target, but I'm open to other options.

Thanks,

Paolo