[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241130082630.2007-1-liqiang64@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 16:26:30 +0800
From: liqiang <liqiang64@...wei.com>
To: <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>, <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC: <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<luanjianhai@...wei.com>, <zhangxuzhou4@...wei.com>,
<dengguangxing@...wei.com>, <gaochao24@...wei.com>, <liqiang64@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: Optimize the timing of unlocking in smc_listen_work
The optimized code is equivalent to the original process, and it releases the
lock early.
Signed-off-by: liqiang <liqiang64@...wei.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 9d76e902fd77..7fa80be1ea93 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -2526,9 +2526,9 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!ini->is_smcd) {
rc = smc_listen_rdma_finish(new_smc, cclc,
ini->first_contact_local, ini);
- if (rc)
- goto out_unlock;
mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out_decl;
}
smc_conn_save_peer_info(new_smc, cclc);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists