lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed04079e-2bd8-453b-9076-aabb6095d3e4@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:20:41 +0800
From: Li Qiang <liqiang64@...wei.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>, <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>, <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<luanjianhai@...wei.com>, <zhangxuzhou4@...wei.com>,
	<dengguangxing@...wei.com>, <gaochao24@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: Optimize the timing of unlocking in
 smc_listen_work



在 2024/12/1 3:04, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 16:26:30 +0800 liqiang wrote:
>> The optimized code is equivalent to the original process, and it releases the
>> lock early.
> 
> By a single clock cycle? You need to provide much more detailed
> justification, otherwise this looks like churn for no real gain.

I don't have any more information about this patch, I saw that
the lock will be released regardless of branch true or false,
so brought it forward.

Thanks for your reply, Jakub!
:)

-- 
Cheers,
Li Qiang


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ