netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 37/37] rxrpc: Implement RACK/TLP to deal with transmission stalls [RFC8985]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241202194834.67982f7f@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:48:34 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>, Yunsheng
 Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 37/37] rxrpc: Implement RACK/TLP to deal with
 transmission stalls [RFC8985]

On Mon,  2 Dec 2024 14:30:55 +0000 David Howells wrote:
> +static inline ktime_t us_to_ktime(u64 us)
> +{
> +	return us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +}

Is there a reason this doesn't exist in include/linux/ktime.h ?
Given ns_to_ktime and ms_to_ktime already exist there adding a local
but very similarly named helper in a local file appears questionable.