netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V4 00/11] net/mlx5: ConnectX-8 SW Steering + Rate management on traffic classes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <175d7ebd-336c-4e02-b494-3d5580f99111@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 00:25:18 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
 Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 00/11] net/mlx5: ConnectX-8 SW Steering + Rate
 management on traffic classes

On 04/12/2024 15:47, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> On 03.12.24 21:29, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patchset starts with 3 patches that modify the IFC, targeted to
>> mlx5-next in order to be taken to rdma-next branch side sooner than in
>> the next merge window.
>>
>> This patchset consists of two features:
>> 1. In patches 4-5, Itamar adds SW Steering support for ConnectX-8.
>> 2. Followed by patches by Carolina that add rate management support on
>> traffic classes in devlink and mlx5, more details below [1].
>>
>> Series generated against:
>> commit e8e7be7d212d ("mctp i2c: drop check because 
>> i2c_unregister_device() is NULL safe")
> 
>  From the link https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/all-patches-must- 
> include-base-commit-info,
> 
> If we use --base=auto or the commit id (in this patch, the commit id 
> should be e8e7be7d212d), then we will notice that the commits will have 
> the base-commit: tailer at the very bottom.
> 
> This seems somewhat professional compared to the above. ^_^
> 
> Best Regards,
> Zhu Yanjun
> 

Thanks for your comment!
Noted. I'll use it in my next submissions.