[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7c4d3ba-6ba7-4eba-bb2a-c6b7e3adda16@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 04:18:44 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/10] net: phylink: add EEE management
> It will also call into the MAC driver when LPI needs to be enabled or
> disabled, with the expectation that the MAC have LPI disabled during
> probe.
How important is this expectation? I don't see it documented anywhere.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists