[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241213105508.GL2110@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:55:08 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Joe Hattori <joe@...is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Cc: rafal@...ecki.pl, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: bgmac-platform: fix an OF node reference
leak
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 11:32:56AM +0900, Joe Hattori wrote:
> The OF node obtained by of_parse_phandle() is not freed. Define a
> device node with __free(device_node) to fix the leak.
>
> This bug was found by an experimental static analysis tool that I am
> developing.
>
> Fixes: 1676aba5ef7e ("net: ethernet: bgmac: device tree phy enablement")
> Signed-off-by: Joe Hattori <joe@...is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c
> index ecce23cecbea..ca07a6d26590 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-platform.c
> @@ -236,7 +236,10 @@ static int bgmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> bgmac->cco_ctl_maskset = platform_bgmac_cco_ctl_maskset;
> bgmac->get_bus_clock = platform_bgmac_get_bus_clock;
> bgmac->cmn_maskset32 = platform_bgmac_cmn_maskset32;
> - if (of_parse_phandle(np, "phy-handle", 0)) {
> +
> + struct device_node *phy_node __free(device_node) =
> + of_parse_phandle(np, "phy-handle", 0);
> + if (phy_node) {
> bgmac->phy_connect = platform_phy_connect;
> } else {
> bgmac->phy_connect = bgmac_phy_connect_direct;
Hi Joe,
I agree this is a problem and that it was introduced by the
cited commit. But I wonder if we can consider a different approach.
I would suggest that rather than using __free the node is explicitly
released. Something like this (untested):
struct device_node *phy_node;
...
phy_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "phy-handle", 0);
if (phy_node) {
of_node_put(phy_node);
bgmac->phy_connect = platform_phy_connect;
} ...
That is, assuming that it is safe to release phy_node so early.
If not, some adjustment should be made to when of_node_put()
is called.
This is for several reasons;
1. I could be wrong, but I believe your patch kfree's phy_node,
but my understanding is that correct operation is to call
of_node_put().
2. More importantly, there is a preference in Newkorking code
not to use __free and similar constructs.
"Low level cleanup constructs (such as __free()) can be used when
building APIs and helpers, especially scoped iterators. However,
direct use of __free() within networking core and drivers is
discouraged. Similar guidance applies to declaring variables
mid-function.
Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#using-device-managed-and-cleanup-h-constructs
3. As per the end of the quote above, there is a preference to declare all
local variables at the top of the function (ideally, in reverse xmas
tree order [*})
[*] https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#local-variable-ordering-reverse-xmas-tree-rcs
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists