[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241213173829.305b8048@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:38:29 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] netdev: fix repeated netlink messages in queue
dumps
Thanks for the reviews!
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:52:11 -0800 Joe Damato wrote:
> Patches 3, 4, and 5 seem like new features, though. Should those
> three be a separate series against net-next, instead?
Right, this case is a bit disputable. Docs and selftests can't really
break the current release. And someone who backports the fixes should
be able to easily test them.
Also, thinking selfishly as a maintainer, having them in one series
saves me mental tracking of who promised to send tests via another
tree and hasn't posted them yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists