[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfa40af2-e726-477a-bab2-7abebfdd6384@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:48:12 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
song@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, yhs@...com,
edumazet@...gle.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] net/smc: bpf: register smc_ops info
struct_ops
On 12/17/24 6:44 PM, D. Wythe wrote:
> +static int smc_bpf_ops_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
> + const struct btf_member *member,
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
> +
> + switch (moff) {
> + case offsetof(struct smc_ops, name):
> + case offsetof(struct smc_ops, flags):
> + case offsetof(struct smc_ops, set_option):
> + case offsetof(struct smc_ops, set_option_cond):
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
The whole smc_bpf_ops_check_member() should not be needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists