[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241218185909.363b9dfc@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:59:09 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Tony Lindgren
<tony@...mide.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Russell King -
ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add phy_disable_eee
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:43:11 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > @@ -2071,6 +2071,7 @@ void phy_advertise_eee_all(struct phy_device *phydev);
> > void phy_support_sym_pause(struct phy_device *phydev);
> > void phy_support_asym_pause(struct phy_device *phydev);
> > void phy_support_eee(struct phy_device *phydev);
> > +void phy_disable_eee(struct phy_device *phydev);
>
> So we have three states:
>
> MAC tells PHYLIB it does support EEE
> MAC tells PHYLIB it does not support EEE
> MAC says nothing.
>
> Do we really want this?
Hi Andrew, do you feel convinced? I think I messed up merging some EEE
patches recently, an explicit Ack would boost my confidence..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists