[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6765a1d89686a_21de220813@john.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:56:56 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Levi Zim <rsworktech@...look.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Fix NPE discovered by running bpf kselftest
Björn Töpel wrote:
> John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> writes:
>
> >> Took the series for a run, and it does solve crash, but I'm getting
> >> additional failures:
> >
> > Thanks! I'm guessing those tests were failing even without the patch
> > though right?
>
> Correct.
Thanks Bjorn!
>
> test_sockmap did however pass the full suite in 6.12. So, something
> changed with the addition of [1].
Agree with finding this. I also have a compliance test failing in one
of our nginx/apache/bpf test suites so might be related. I'll dig into
it.
>
> I guess:
>
> Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Because when I find the bug that gets here I would have stacked this on
top of any fix as well I think lets apply this now.
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
>
> can be added to this series, and not crashing is nice, but it would be
> interesting to know how it got there.
>
>
> Björn
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241106222520.527076-1-zijianzhang@bytedance.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists