[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241223124431.1d34888f@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 12:44:31 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, John
Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/29] net/tls: use the new scatterwalk functions
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:42:49 -0800 Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks. FYI I will need to update this patch in the next version, as I did not
> take into consideration what chain_to_walk() is doing. This code seems to be a
> bit unique in how it is using the scatterwalk functions.
>
> Also I think the second paragraph of my commit message is wrong, as the calls to
> scatterwalk_done() in tls_enc_records() are the ones I thought were missing.
netdev@ only got CCed on this one patch so TBH I have trusted
the conversion :(
FWIW tls has a relatively solid selftest:
tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists