lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <befd6574-b9f0-4483-a767-684a729cfde0@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:48:00 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        konradybcio@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, richardcochran@...il.com,
        geert+renesas@...der.be, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
        neil.armstrong@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, nfraprado@...labora.com,
        quic_anusha@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, quic_srichara@...cinc.com,
        quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] clk: qcom: Add NSS clock Controller driver for
 IPQ9574

On 28.10.2024 7:25 AM, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/25/2024 11:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:25:18AM +0530, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>> From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>>>
>>> Add Networking Sub System Clock Controller(NSSCC) driver for ipq9574 based
>>> devices.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410101431.tjpSRNTY-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> These tags are incorrect. Please read the text of the email that you've
>> got.
> 
> Added these tags since the dependent patch [1] was included in v8.
> Please let me know if this should be removed.

These tags are useful when you submit a faulty patch, it gets merged
quickly, and only then the robot reports it. In that situation, you
would be expected to send a fix, including these tags to credit the
robot for catching the issue.

Here, your patches haven't been merged yet, so it's not applicable.

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ