[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f7a83-6777e880-a451-5cf12280@99910178>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 14:39:21 +0100
From: "Ariel Otilibili-Anieli" <Ariel.Otilibili-Anieli@...ecom.fr>
To: "Stanislaw Gruszka" <stf_xl@...pl>
Cc: "Daniel Golle" <daniel@...rotopia.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Kalle Valo" <kvalo@...nel.org>, Tomislav Požega <pozega.tomislav@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rt2x00: Remove unusued value
Hello Stanislaw, hello Daniel; happy new year,
On Friday, January 03, 2025 14:10 CET, Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 11:40:52AM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 09:55:40AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >
> > I agree with the likely intention here, however, the vendor driver
> > also comes with the dead code, see
> > https://github.com/lixuande/rt2860v2/blob/master/files/rt2860v2/common/cmm_rf_cal.c#L2690
> >
> > So this is certainly a bug in the vendor driver as well which got ported
> > bug-by-bug to rt2x00... Not sure what is the best thing to do in this
> > case.
>
> As this was already tested and match vendor driver I would prefer
> not to change behavior even if it looks suspicious.
Thanks for having looked into this; I much appreciate your feedback.
>From what you two said, I understand that the patch should remove the duplicate code, and not change the logic behind.
Is this right?
If so; then, I have nothing else to do.
>
> Regards
> Stanislaw
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists