[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250107195304.2671-1-johndale@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:53:04 -0800
From: John Daley <johndale@...co.com>
To: michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
benve@...co.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
johndale@...co.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
neescoba@...co.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
satishkh@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] enic: Obtain the Link speed only after the link comes up
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
>> index 957efe73e41a..49f6cab01ed5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
>> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static struct enic_intr_mod_table mod_table[ENIC_MAX_COALESCE_TIMERS + 1] = {
>> static struct enic_intr_mod_range mod_range[ENIC_MAX_LINK_SPEEDS] = {
>> {0, 0}, /* 0 - 4 Gbps */
>> {0, 3}, /* 4 - 10 Gbps */
>> - {3, 6}, /* 10 - 40 Gbps */
>> + {3, 6}, /* 10+ Gbps */
>
>Is this on purpose? You didn't mention anything about speed range in
>commit message. Just wondering, patch looks fine, thanks.
I changed the comment on purpose since it applies to adapters way past
40 Gbps nowdays. I should have mentioned the change. Thanks for the
reveiw.
>
>Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists