[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250108061050.9328-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:10:50 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <horms@...nel.org>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 0/2] dev: Hold per-netns RTNL in register_netdev().
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 13:55:51 +0100
> On 1/4/25 9:21 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > Patch 1 adds rtnl_net_lock_killable() and Patch 2 uses it in
> > register_netdev() and converts it and unregister_netdev() to
> > per-netns RTNL.
> >
> > With this and the netdev notifier series [0], ASSERT_RTNL_NET()
> > for NETDEV_REGISTER [1] wasn't fired on a simplest QEMU setup
> > like e1000 + x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_DEBUG_NET_SMALL_RTNL.
> >
> > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250104063735.36945-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
> >
> > [1]:
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/net/core/rtnl_net_debug.c b/net/core/rtnl_net_debug.c
> > index f406045cbd0e..c0c30929002e 100644
> > --- a/net/core/rtnl_net_debug.c
> > +++ b/net/core/rtnl_net_debug.c
> > @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ static int rtnl_net_debug_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > case NETDEV_DOWN:
> > case NETDEV_REBOOT:
> > case NETDEV_CHANGE:
> > - case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> > case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> > case NETDEV_CHANGEMTU:
> > case NETDEV_CHANGEADDR:
> > @@ -60,19 +59,10 @@ static int rtnl_net_debug_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > ASSERT_RTNL();
> > break;
> >
> > - /* Once an event fully supports RTNL_NET, move it here
> > - * and remove "if (0)" below.
> > - *
> > - * case NETDEV_XXX:
> > - * ASSERT_RTNL_NET(net);
> > - * break;
> > - */
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Just to avoid unused-variable error for dev and net. */
> > - if (0)
> > + case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> > ASSERT_RTNL_NET(net);
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > }
> > ---8<---
>
> FTR, the above fooled a bit both PW and our scripts: I had to manually
> mangle the cover letter into the merge commit. I guess it would be good
> to avoid patch snips in the cover-letter,
Oh sorry, noted.
Thank you !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists