netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: realtek: rename realtek.c to realtek

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z4EVLteK6aU10PSr@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:40:14 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: realtek: rename realtek.c to
 realtek_main.c

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:47:39PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> In preparation of adding a source file with hwmon support, rename
> realtek.c to realtek_main.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/Makefile                      | 1 +
>  drivers/net/phy/{realtek.c => realtek_main.c} | 0
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  rename drivers/net/phy/{realtek.c => realtek_main.c} (100%)

Is it worth considering a vendor subdirectory when PHYs end up with
multiple source files?

We already have aquantia, mediatek, mscc, and qcom. Should we be
considering it for this as well?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!