[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9cb9fe0-da31-4824-b452-3c4cfcc454e9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:35:48 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: realtek: rename realtek.c to
realtek_main.c
On 10.01.2025 13:40, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:47:39PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> In preparation of adding a source file with hwmon support, rename
>> realtek.c to realtek_main.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/net/phy/{realtek.c => realtek_main.c} | 0
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> rename drivers/net/phy/{realtek.c => realtek_main.c} (100%)
>
> Is it worth considering a vendor subdirectory when PHYs end up with
> multiple source files?
>
> We already have aquantia, mediatek, mscc, and qcom. Should we be
> considering it for this as well?
>
Yes, I think this would make sense. I'll submit a v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists