netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net] net: sched: refine software bypass handling in tc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7b144d9-7099-42b1-b057-f6101b4580eb@fiberby.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:33:27 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
 Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
 Shuang Li <shuali@...hat.com>, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] net: sched: refine software bypass handling in
 tc_run

On 1/14/25 2:30 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:41 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
>> I will run it through some tests tomorrow with my patch applied.
> That will be great. :-)

Hi Xin,

Given the already posted changes, when I rerun the benchmark tests from my
original patch last year, I don't see any significant differences in the
forwarding performance. (single 8-core CPU, no parallel rule updates)

The test code is linked in my original patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240325204740.1393349-4-ast@fiberby.net/