lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dq+uxtuH8H8jnPGQgzSSPMh50Q2fbkvhDPQ-O1OqgOCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 21:33:20 -0500
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, 
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, 
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>, Shuang Li <shuali@...hat.com>, 
	network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] net: sched: refine software bypass handling in tc_run

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 12:33 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
>
> On 1/14/25 2:30 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:41 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
> >> I will run it through some tests tomorrow with my patch applied.
> > That will be great. :-)
>
> Hi Xin,
>
> Given the already posted changes, when I rerun the benchmark tests from my
> original patch last year, I don't see any significant differences in the
> forwarding performance. (single 8-core CPU, no parallel rule updates)
>
> The test code is linked in my original patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240325204740.1393349-4-ast@fiberby.net/
Thanks!
I will post v3 on net-next.git tomorrow.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ