lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250114150043.222e1eb5@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:00:43 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Andrew
 Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] ethtool: allow ethtool op set_eee to
 set an NL extack message

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:28:22 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> index f711bfd75..8ee047747 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ struct ethtool_keee {
>  	__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(supported);
>  	__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(advertised);
>  	__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(lp_advertised);
> +	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack;
>  	u32	tx_lpi_timer;
>  	bool	tx_lpi_enabled;
>  	bool	eee_active;

:S I don't think we have a precedent for passing extack inside 
the paramter struct. I see 25 .set_eee callbacks, not crazy many.
Could you plumb this thru as a separate argument, please?
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ