[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250115091223.46052-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:12:23 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <jdamato@...tly.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: protect napi->irq with netdev_lock()
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:53:17 -0800
> Take netdev_lock() in netif_napi_set_irq(). All NAPI "control fields"
> are now protected by that lock (most of the other ones are set during
> napi add/del). The napi_hash_node is fully protected by the hash
> spin lock, but close enough for the kdoc...
>
> Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists