netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: microchip: Add SGMII port support to KSZ9477 switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250118012632.qf4jmwz2bry43qqe@skbuf>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 03:26:32 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com,
	Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: microchip: Add SGMII port support
 to KSZ9477 switch

On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 12:59:25AM +0000, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com wrote:
> Some of the register definitions are not present in the XPCS driver so I
> need to add them.

Not a problem.

> Some register bits programmed by the XPCS driver do not have effect.

Like what?

> Actually KSZ9477 has a bug in SGMII implementation and needs a software
> workaround.  I am not sure if the generic XCPS driver can cover that.

What kind of bug? In the integration or in the IP itself? Anyway,
SJA1105 had what you could call an integration bug too, and that's why
nxp_sja1105_sgmii_pma_config() exists. I am not sure either until you
are more specific.

It is a widespread hardware IP. I don't think it's unreasonable to have
a central driver for it with many quirks, as long as they're well documented
and clearly understood.