lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250124174702.59c4b16b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:47:02 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Cc: "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "liuhangbin@...il.com"
 <liuhangbin@...il.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, Tariq
 Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "razor@...ckwall.org"
 <razor@...ckwall.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "liali@...hat.com" <liali@...hat.com>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com"
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, "jv@...sburgh.net" <jv@...sburgh.net>,
 "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "horms@...nel.org"
 <horms@...nel.org>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>, Boris Pismenny
 <borisp@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] Bonding: Fix support for gso_partial_features

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:03:32 +0000 Cosmin Ratiu wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 07:38 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:24:37 +0000 Cosmin Ratiu wrote:  
> > > I've sent another patch to suggest these changes.  
> > 
> > FTR this is not the normal way to proceed in code review,
> > please try to share your feedback rather than taking over
> > the submission (unless the original author explicitly asks
> > you to).  
> 
> Apologies, I didn't want to take over the submission, both me and
> Hangbin were simultaneously looking to fix this issue. I was about to
> send my fix when I saw his proposed one (this thread) and in the
> interest of expediting the solution, I decided to send mine in addition
> to commenting here.
> 
> Given that we were both fixing the same thing, would adding Signed-off-
> by with both of us be ok?

That's up to you, but keep in mind for the future that the discussion
on how to proceed has to happen before you post your own version.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ