[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6NcWfVbqDJJ4c11@t-dallas>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 20:40:57 +0800
From: Ted Chen <znscnchen@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vxlan_rcv(): Update comment to inlucde
ipv6
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 2/5/25 13:44, Ted Chen wrote:
> > Update the comment to indicate that both net/ipv4/udp.c and net/ipv6/udp.c
> > invoke vxlan_rcv() to process packets.
> >
> > The comment aligns with that for vxlan_err_lookup().
> >
> > Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ted Chen <znscnchen@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > index 5ef40ac816cc..8bdf91d1fdfe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > @@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ static bool vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(struct vxlan_sock *vs, void *oiph,
> > return err <= 1;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Callback from net/ipv4/udp.c to receive packets */
> > +/* Callback from net/ipv{4,6}/udp.c to receive packets */
> > static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode = NULL;
>
> Your subject has a typo
> s/inlucde/include
Oops. Sorry for that.
> IMO these comments are unnecessary, encap_rcv callers are trivial to find.
I'm fine with either way. No comment is better than a wrong comment.
Please let me know if I need to send a new version to correct the subject or
remove the comments for both vxlan_rcv() and vxlan_err_lookup().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists