netdev - Re: [PATCH netdev] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Provide FIFO sizes for DWMAC 1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z6OjmtiZ4A8BzvsP@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:44:58 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
	Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Provide FIFO sizes for
 DWMAC 1000

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 05:38:24PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:45:17AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 5:43 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed,  5 Feb 2025 00:13:59 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > > Since a fix for stmmac in general has already been sent [1] and a revert
> > > > was also proposed [2], I'll refrain from sending mine.
> > >
> > > No, no, please do. You need to _submit_ the revert like a normal patch.
> > > With all the usual details in the commit message.
> > 
> > Mine isn't a revert, but simply downgrading the error to a warning.
> > So... yet another workaround approach.
> 
> I think the point is that someone needs to formally
> submit the revert. And I assume it should target the net tree.

For what I think is the third time today (fourth if you include the
actual patch...)

https://lore.kernel.org/r/E1tfeyR-003YGJ-Gb@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!