netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating two modes of SO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250204191433.4cfa990a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:14:33 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, willemb@...gle.com,
 ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
 yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
 sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/12] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating
 two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:40:42 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> I wonder if we need a separate cleanup after this series about moving
> this kind of functions into net/core/timestamping.c, say,
> __skb_tstamp_tx()?

IMHO no need to go too far, just move the one function as part of this
series. The only motivation is to avoid adding includes to
linux/skbuff.h since skbuff.h is included in something like 8k objects.