[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DM6PR12MB4516A1AD2B1953FF7D48839AD8F72@DM6PR12MB4516.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 07:45:45 +0000
From: Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "mkubecek@...e.cz"
<mkubecek@...e.cz>, "matt@...verse.com.au" <matt@...verse.com.au>,
"daniel.zahka@...il.com" <daniel.zahka@...il.com>, Amit Cohen
<amcohen@...dia.com>, NBU-mlxsw <NBU-mlxsw@...hange.nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH ethtool-next v3 10/16] qsfp: Add JSON output handling to
--module-info in SFF8636 modules
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2025 4:34
> To: Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; mkubecek@...e.cz; matt@...verse.com.au;
> daniel.zahka@...il.com; Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>; NBU-mlxsw
> <nbu-mlxsw@...hange.nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool-next v3 10/16] qsfp: Add JSON output handling
> to --module-info in SFF8636 modules
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:39:51 +0200 Danielle Ratson wrote:
> > +#define YESNO(x) (((x) != 0) ? "Yes" : "No") #define ONOFF(x) (((x)
> > +!= 0) ? "On" : "Off")
>
> Are these needed ? It appears we have them defined twice after this
> series:
>
> $ git grep 'define YES'
> cmis.h:#define YESNO(x) (((x) != 0) ? "Yes" : "No") module-common.h:#define
> YESNO(x) (((x) != 0) ? "Yes" : "No")
No I guess it is a leftover, will remove, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists