netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net 11/16] ipv6: input: convert to dev_net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+AozhFhZNK0Y4e_EqXV1=yKjGuvf43Wa6JJKWMOixWQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 08:57:06 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, eric.dumazet@...il.com, 
	rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 11/16] ipv6: input: convert to dev_net_rcu()

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 10:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 13:17:08 -0800 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > TBH I'm slightly confused by this, and the previous warnings.
> > > >
> > > > The previous one was from a timer callback.
> > > >
> > > > This one is with BH disabled.
> > > >
> > > > I thought BH implies RCU protection. We certainly depend on that
> > > > in NAPI for XDP. And threaded NAPI does the exact same thing as
> > > > xfrm_trans_reinject(), a bare local_bh_disable().
> > > >
> > > > RCU folks, did something change or is just holes in my brain again?
> > >
> > > Nope, BH does not imply rcu_read_lock()
> >
> > You are both right?  ;-)
> >
> > The synchronize_rcu() function will wait for all types of RCU readers,
> > including BH-disabled regions of code.  However, lockdep can distinguish
> > between the various sorts of readers.  So for example
> >
> >       lockdep_assert_in_rcu_read_lock_bh();
> >
> > will complain unless you did rcu_read_lock_bh(), even if you did something
> > like disable_bh().  If you don't want to distinguish and are happy with
> > any type of RCU reader, you can use
> >
> >       lockdep_assert_in_rcu_reader();
> >
> > I have been expecting that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels will break this
> > any day now, but so far so good.  ;-)
>
> Thanks Paul! So IIUC in this case we could:
>
> diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
> index 0f5eb9db0c62..58ec1eb9ae6a 100644
> --- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static inline struct net *read_pnet(const possible_net_t *pnet)
>  static inline struct net *read_pnet_rcu(possible_net_t *pnet)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> -       return rcu_dereference(pnet->net);
> +       return rcu_dereference_check(pnet->net, rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
>  #else
>         return &init_net;
>  #endif
>
> Sorry for the sideline, Eric, up to you how to proceed..

I will squash this diff to the following iteration, and keep rcu_dereference()

Note that nf_hook() also grabs rcu_read_lock().

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
index 4030527ebe098e86764f37c9068d2f2f9af2d183..ee5a69fdc67a30e55c5a073455e1d7299f168f34
100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
@@ -477,9 +477,7 @@ void ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net,
struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr,
 static int ip6_input_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct
sk_buff *skb)
 {
        skb_clear_delivery_time(skb);
-       rcu_read_lock();
        ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu(net, skb, 0, false);
-       rcu_read_unlock();

        return 0;
 }
@@ -487,9 +485,14 @@ static int ip6_input_finish(struct net *net,
struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *sk

 int ip6_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-       return NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
-                      dev_net_rcu(skb->dev), NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
-                      ip6_input_finish);
+       int res;
+
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       res = NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_LOCAL_IN,
+                     dev_net_rcu(skb->dev), NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
+                     ip6_input_finish);
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+       return res;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip6_input);