netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] bnxt: Create an auxiliary device for fwctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250208011647.GH3660748@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:16:47 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>,
	Aron Silverton <aron.silverton@...cle.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Itay Avraham <itayavr@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Leonid Bloch <lbloch@...dia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@....com>,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] bnxt: Create an auxiliary device for fwctl_bnxt

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:51:11PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

> But if you agree the netdev doesn't need it seems like a fairly
> straightforward way to unblock your progress.

I'm trying to understand what you are suggesting here.

We have many scenarios where mlx5_core spawns all kinds of different
devices, including recovery cases where there is no networking at all
and only fwctl. So we can't just discard the aux dev or mlx5_core
triggered setup without breaking scenarios.

However, you seem to be suggesting that netdev-only configurations (ie
netdev loaded but no rdma loaded) should disable fwctl. Is that the
case? All else would remain the same. It is very ugly but I could see
a technical path to do it, and would consider it if that brings peace.

Jason