netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] netlink: specs: add conntrack dump and stats dump support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250212182007.GG1615191@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:20:07 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, donald.hunter@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] netlink: specs: add conntrack dump and stats
 dump support

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:54:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:27:03 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:21:52 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:  
> > > > This adds support to dump the connection tracking table
> > > > ("conntrack -L") and the conntrack statistics, ("conntrack -S").  
> > > 
> > > Hi Florian!
> > > 
> > > Some unhappiness in the HTML doc generation coming from this spec:
> > > 
> > > /home/doc-build/testing/Documentation/networking/netlink_spec/ctnetlink.rst:68: WARNING: duplicate label conntrack-definition-nfgenmsg, other instance in /home/doc-build/testing/Documentation/networking/netlink_spec/conntrack.rst  
> > 
> > Looks like the tree has both v1 and v2 appliedto it.
> > 
> > v1 added 'ctnetlink.yaml', I renamed it to 'conntrack.yaml' in v2 as
> > thats what Donald requested.
> 
> I see. We need to clean the HTML output more thoroughly in the CI 🤔️
> I brought the patch back, let's see what happens on next run.

It seems happy now.

Should I work on a fix for NIPA?