[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250212182111.GH1615191@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:21:11 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
decot@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, madhu.chittim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: check error for register_netdev() on init
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:38:51PM -0800, Emil Tantilov wrote:
> Current init logic ignores the error code from register_netdev(),
> which will cause WARN_ON() on attempt to unregister it, if there was one,
> and there is no info for the user that the creation of the netdev failed.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 89 PID: 6902 at net/core/dev.c:11512 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x211/0x1a10
> ...
> [ 3707.563641] unregister_netdev+0x1c/0x30
> [ 3707.563656] idpf_vport_dealloc+0x5cf/0xce0 [idpf]
> [ 3707.563684] idpf_deinit_task+0xef/0x160 [idpf]
> [ 3707.563712] idpf_vc_core_deinit+0x84/0x320 [idpf]
> [ 3707.563739] idpf_remove+0xbf/0x780 [idpf]
> [ 3707.563769] pci_device_remove+0xab/0x1e0
> [ 3707.563786] device_release_driver_internal+0x371/0x530
> [ 3707.563803] driver_detach+0xbf/0x180
> [ 3707.563816] bus_remove_driver+0x11b/0x2a0
> [ 3707.563829] pci_unregister_driver+0x2a/0x250
>
> Introduce an error check and log the vport number and error code.
> On removal make sure to check VPORT_REG_NETDEV flag prior to calling
> unregister and free on the netdev.
>
> Add local variables for idx, vport_config and netdev for readability.
>
> Fixes: 0fe45467a104 ("idpf: add create vport and netdev configuration")
> Reviewed-by: Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@...el.com>
> Suggested-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c | 27 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c
...
> @@ -1536,12 +1540,17 @@ void idpf_init_task(struct work_struct *work)
> }
>
> for (index = 0; index < adapter->max_vports; index++) {
> - if (adapter->netdevs[index] &&
> - !test_bit(IDPF_VPORT_REG_NETDEV,
> - adapter->vport_config[index]->flags)) {
> - register_netdev(adapter->netdevs[index]);
> - set_bit(IDPF_VPORT_REG_NETDEV,
> - adapter->vport_config[index]->flags);
> + struct idpf_vport_config *vport_config = adapter->vport_config[index];
> + struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdevs[index];
> +
> + if (netdev && !test_bit(IDPF_VPORT_REG_NETDEV, vport_config->flags)) {
> + err = register_netdev(netdev);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register netdev for vport %d: %pe\n",
> + index, ERR_PTR(err));
> + continue;
> + }
> + set_bit(IDPF_VPORT_REG_NETDEV, vport_config->flags);
> }
> }
Hi Emil,
I'm wondering if we could reduce indentation and lines longer
than 80 characters in the above like this (completely untested!):
for (index = 0; index < adapter->max_vports; index++) {
struct idpf_vport_config *vport_config = adapter->vport_config[index];
struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdevs[index];
if (!netdev ||
test_bit(IDPF_VPORT_REG_NETDEV, vport_config->flags))
continue;
err = register_netdev(netdev);
if (err) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register netdev for vport %d: %pe\n",
index, ERR_PTR(err));
continue;
}
set_bit(IDPF_VPORT_REG_NETDEV, vport_config->flags);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists