[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f253c4b6-e4ee-44a3-953d-44f20ac5e79d@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:12:46 +0100
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Tatyana Nikolova <tatyana.e.nikolova@...el.com>, <jgg@...dia.com>, "Jakub
Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "Eric
Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [iwl-next,rdma v3 00/24] Add RDMA support for Intel IPU E2000
(GEN3)
On 2/10/25 12:09, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
>> On 2/7/25 20:49, Tatyana Nikolova wrote:
>>> This patch series is based on 6.14-rc1 and includes both netdev and RDMA
>>> patches for ease of review. It can also be viewed here [1]. A shared pull
>>> request will be sent for patches 1-7 following review.
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>> TLDR of my mail: could be take 1st patch prior to the rest?
>>
>>> V2 RFC series is at https://lwn.net/Articles/987141/.
>>
>> code there was mostly the same, and noone commented, I bet due
>> to the sheer size of the series
>
> It was very optimistic to expect for a review during holiday season
> and merge window, especially series of 25 patches which are marked
> as RFC.
that's true
so, given most of the patches will go via your tree, how do you want
to split us the existing ones into series?
a) 1st, idpf, rdma
b) 1st, rest
c) all together
In any case I will do a review too of course
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists